In recent discussions surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), the assertion that every project requires an editor’s letter has been met with strong resistance. The author, preoccupied with various commitments—including podcast production, conference preparations, and personal responsibilities—communicated with their editor through silence, envisioning a world where AI was not an incessant topic of conversation.
The editor responded, urging a perspective shift: instead of an editor’s letter, consider it a brief article related to the AI package. While the author acknowledges the editor’s point, they express disinterest in the notion of an AI manifesto for WIRED. Since their hiring in July 2023, the author has faced a barrage of inquiries on their stance regarding AI from colleagues, industry professionals, family members, and fellow journalists, which has significantly impacted their availability for social engagements.
A small relief comes from the author’s spouse, who, engrossed in creating AI-generated films, is largely indifferent to the author’s work-related thoughts on AI. Colleagues at WIRED seem to share a similar perspective: AI is not a novel phenomenon but rather a technology that has evolved over decades. The current interest in AI, especially the deep-learning approach, may seem daunting; however, the author believes it is not as significant as some portray it to be.
The article emphasizes that generative AI serves varied purposes—it can be beneficial in some scenarios and ineffective in others. The author warns that while AI might seem revolutionary, it is expensive and resource-intensive to develop, deploy, and promote. The author perceives a potential economic bubble surrounding AI and suggests that while a collapse may have immediate negative consequences, certain aspects of AI will persist and influence daily life afterward.
On the matter of journalism, opinions vary on whether generative AI threatens the integrity of the field. Google emphasizes the importance of delivering accurate information through traditional news channels, even as they integrate AI tools that could undermine those same publishers. In contrast, Meta’s approach has drawn criticism for disrupting the news industry, producing low-quality content that fails to resonate with audiences.
At WIRED, AI will be employed selectively; it has already been used for fact-checking and initial research tasks. Traditional journalism, characterized by human insight and expression, remains irreplaceable. The author underscores the importance of utilizing technology to enhance human creativity where applicable.
Readers of WIRED are encouraged to adopt a balanced approach to AI. Familiarity with these tools is advisable, but maintaining human interactions and education for children is crucial. The author concludes that while AI continues to dominate conversations, it is just one aspect of an ever-evolving technological landscape.
The author intends to wrap up their thoughts, given that not every publication requires an editor’s letter, and they also have a personal health matter that needs human evaluation.
