In the last ten years, encrypted communication has become standard for billions of users worldwide. Every day, platforms such as Signal, iMessage, and WhatsApp ensure the privacy of billions of messages, photos, videos, and calls through default end-to-end encryption, while services like Zoom and Discord offer options to enhance this protection. Despite the widespread acceptance of this technology, long-standing threats to undermine encryption are on the rise.
Recently, government and law enforcement initiatives aimed at weakening encryption have surged, according to privacy advocates and experts. Some of these emerging threats are considered by observers to be among the most aggressive and overt seen in years. Since the beginning of 2025, officials in the UK, France, and Sweden have initiated steps that could diminish or entirely eliminate the safeguards of end-to-end encryption, contributing to a prolonged European Union plan to monitor private conversations alongside India’s efforts that may jeopardize encryption.
These latest attacks on encryption occur amidst a notable shift in attitude among U.S. intelligence agencies and law enforcement officials, who have recently reversed years of anti-encryption rhetoric, now encouraging the use of encrypted communication platforms wherever possible. This significant change follows the extensive breach by the China-backed Salt Typhoon hacker group of major U.S. telecommunications firms and comes as the second Trump administration heightens potential surveillance measures targeting millions of undocumented immigrants in the country. Concurrently, the administration is challenging long-standing, essential international intelligence-sharing arrangements and partnerships.
“The outlook is grim,” states Carmela Troncoso, a seasoned researcher in privacy and cryptography and the scientific director at the Max-Planck Institute for Security and Privacy in Germany. “We see these new policies emerging like mushrooms, attempting to undermine encryption.”
End-to-end encryption is designed so that only the sender and the intended recipient can access the content of their messages, preventing governments, tech companies, and telecom providers from spying on communications. This aspect of privacy and security has made encryption a target for law enforcement and government scrutiny for decades. Officials argue that such protections complicate investigations into pressing threats like child sexual abuse and terrorism.
Consequently, governments worldwide have frequently suggested technical solutions that would allow for bypassing encryption and accessing messages for investigative purposes. However, cryptographers and technologists have consistently warned that any backdoor designed to allow access to end-to-end encrypted communications could also be seized by hackers or authoritarian regimes, endangering everyone’s safety. Moreover, it is probable that criminals would develop their own encryption tools to obscure communications, meaning that backdoors in common products could undermine public protections without eradicating usage among malicious actors.
In general, the recent threats to encryption have manifested in three primary forms, according to Namrata Maheshwari, the encryption policy head at the international nonprofit Access Now. First, there are those scenarios where government or law enforcement bodies request that backdoors be integrated into encrypted platforms to enable “lawful access” to content. For instance, in late February, Apple discontinued its encrypted iCloud backup system, known as Advanced Data Protection, in the UK after lawmakers allegedly pressured the company with a secret order requiring Apple to grant access to encrypted files. To comply, Apple would have needed to create a backdoor. This order, criticized by the Trump administration, is slated to be challenged in a secret court session on March 14.
